A novel manual therapy approach for managing acute interscapular pain following median sternotomy for open cardiac surgery: A clinical comparative analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute interscapular pain is a frequent postoperative complication observed in patients who have undergone median sternotomy. This study aimed to assess a novel approach to manual therapy utilizing the Regional Interdependence (RI) concept for managing interscapular pain in post-sternotomy patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an observational study, a cohort of 60 consecutively admitted patients undergoing median sternotomy was enrolled. Data collection involved standardized clinical evaluations conducted at specific time points: prior to manual treatment (T0), following five manual treatments (T5), and at post-treatment days 10 (T10) and 30 (T30). The Experimental Group (EG) received manual treatment based on the RI concept, performed in a seated position to accommodate individual clinical conditions and surgical wound considerations. The Control Group (CG) received simulated treatment involving identical exercises to the EG but lacking the physiological or biomechanical stimulation. RESULTS: Among the initial 60 patients, 36 met the inclusion criteria, while 24 were excluded due to one or more exclusion criteria. Treatment outcomes revealed a statistically significant improvement in the EG compared to the CG, not only in terms of pain reduction but also in functional recovery and consequent disability reduction. DISCUSSION: The RI concept emerges as a potentially valuable therapeutic approach for addressing interscapular dysfunction, particularly in highly complex post-sternotomy patients. This study highlights the clinical relevance of the RI concept in the management of interscapular pain and highlights its potential utility in improving patient outcomes in the challenging context of sternotomy surgery.

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions in pain management in patients with multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive inflammatory and autoimmune neurological disease caused by inflammation and demyelination of the central nervous system. Pain is a typical symptom of central nervous system demyelination, affecting 63% of adults with MS. Recently, the role of non-pharmacological pain management in patients is growing because the non-pharmacological interventions are considered safe, affordable, easy, and accessible. However, to date, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses have comprehensively examined the therapeutic effects of the variety of non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions in the management of pain in patients with MS. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of the non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions in pain management in patients with MS. METHODS: A comprehensive search using PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct databases was performed and included all randomized controlled trials, randomized cross-over trials, and quasi-experimental trials assessing the effect of non-pharmacological interventions for managing pain in patients with MS. This study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines of a systematic review and pair-wise meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed by calculating the standardized mean difference at a 95% confidence interval using Review Manager software. RESULTS: Twenty-nine papers were included in the systematic review, and only 22 of them were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed a significant effect of neuromodulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on pain intensity reduction in patients with MS (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.09, P = 0.02), (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.16 P = 0.01), respectively. The analysis showed significant improvement in pain intensity in patient with MS after mind-body therapies (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.7, P = 0.02), mindfulness (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.14, P = 0.009), hypnosis (SMD -0.88, 95% CI -1.30 to -0.46, P = 0.0001), trigger point therapies (SMD -0.83, 95% CI -1.65 to -0.01, P = 0.05) and cognitive behavioral therapy (SMD -0.64, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.11, P = 0.02). However, there is no significant effect of relaxation therapy on pain reduction in patients with MS (SMD -0.82, 95% CI -1.94 to 0.31, P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the majority of the non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions showed potential therapeutic effects in reducing pain intensity in patients with MS.

Osteoporotic fracture and conservative management in Parkinson's disease and Pisa syndrome: Case report.

Osteoporotic fractures (OF) may occur without major trauma or injury. This case reports present a spine OF in Parkinson's disease (PD) and Pisa syndrome (PS). A 75-years-old woman diagnosed with PD for 19 years and PS has been developed. She recently has acute and severe low back pain. No recent injury or fall. After clinical examination and radiograph imaging, moderate wedge compression OF at L2 was revealed without a spinal cord or nerve compression. A program of conservative treatment was applied include antiosteoporotic supplementary, 6-days of bed rest, spine orthosis, and 10-weeks of exercises. The study adapted to use the following outcomes: visual analogues scale for low back pain, wall goniometer for lateral trunk flexion, and Oswesrty disability index for disability. After the intervention, the outcomes were improved as these values: visual analogues scales 7 points, lateral trunk flexion 20°, and Oswesrty disability index 60%. The case report suggests that the posture deformity as PS in PD may increase the risk of spine OF. The conservative treatment could be beneficial and safe for the OF in PD and PS. Further studies are required to confirm the role of PD postural deformities in OF and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.